Round 3 Gaming Earbud Comparison: Middle Rabbit SW5 vs. JBL Quantum TWS Air vs. Logitech G FITS

Round 3 Gaming Earbud Comparison: Middle Rabbit SW5 vs. JBL Quantum TWS Air vs. Logitech G FITS
Feature Middle Rabbit SW5 JBL Quantum TWS Air Logitech G FITS
Latency 20ms Low-latency (approx. 20-30ms) Unspecified but optimized for gaming
Connection Type 2.4GHz (LE Audio) & Bluetooth 5.4 2.4GHz USB-C & Bluetooth LIGHTSPEED Wireless & Bluetooth
Battery Life 6-8 hours per charge, 32 hours with case 8 hours per charge, 24 hours with case 7 hours per charge, 15 hours with case
Audio Quality HD surround sound, AI-enhanced QuantumSURROUND audio with 6.8mm drivers 10mm drivers, customizable EQ
Microphone AI-powered, clear voice transmission Beamforming microphones Dual beamforming microphones
Water Resistance IPX4 IPX4 Not specified
App Support Yes, with firmware updates and EQ customization No Limited, app for EQ and setup
Compatible socket types USB-C, USB-A USB-C USB-C,USB-A
Compatible devices PC, PS5, PS4, Switch, phone PC, PS5, PS4, Switch, phone PC, PS5, PS4, Switch, phone
Bluetooth and USB connection switching method Press and hold any earbud touch button for 2 seconds Switching not supported Switching requires re-connection and app
Price $59.99 (25% off, originally $79.99) $39.95 (60% off, originally $99.95) $109.99 (27% off, originally $149.99)

When it comes to gaming earbuds, price and performance often go hand-in-hand. In this updated comparison, we take a fresh look at the Middle Rabbit SW5, JBL Quantum TWS Air, and Logitech G FITS True Wireless Gaming Earbuds, focusing on key aspects to help you determine the best option for your needs.

 


1. Latency and Connectivity

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: With ultra-low 20ms latency, the SW5 ensures smooth synchronization for competitive gaming. Its 2.4GHz wireless + Bluetooth 5.4 dual-mode connection supports seamless device switching, offering excellent versatility.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: Boasts low-latency 2.4GHz connectivity and Bluetooth support, ideal for gaming and music. However, switching between modes is less intuitive, requiring manual adjustments.
  • Logitech G FITS: Uses LIGHTSPEED wireless + Bluetooth, providing high-quality connections. However, switching between modes can be cumbersome, impacting usability for multitasking gamers.

Winner: Middle Rabbit SW5 leads with the lowest latency and the most intuitive switching mechanism.


2. Battery Life

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: Offers 6-8 hours of gaming per charge and up to 32 hours total with the charging case, ideal for long gaming sessions or travel.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: Provides 8 hours per charge with 24 hours total via the charging case, slightly lower than the SW5.
  • Logitech G FITS: Delivers 7 hours per charge and 15 hours total with the charging case, the shortest of the three.

Winner: Middle Rabbit SW5, with its longer overall battery life, is better suited for extended use.


3. Audio Quality

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: Features HD surround sound, powered by AI-enhanced microphones for crisp and immersive audio.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: Includes QuantumSURROUND audio with 6.8mm drivers for enhanced spatial sound, especially when paired with PC software.
  • Logitech G FITS: Offers 10mm drivers, delivering strong bass and detailed sound. However, its audio performance may not be as immersive for competitive gaming.

Winner: JBL Quantum TWS Air excels in spatial audio, while SW5 offers balanced audio quality for gaming and music.


4. Comfort and Fit

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: Lightweight and ergonomically designed for long-lasting comfort.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: Comes with three sizes of ear tips for customization but may not stay secure during extended sessions.
  • Logitech G FITS: Uses LIGHTFORM technology to mold the earbuds for a perfect fit, providing exceptional comfort for extended wear.

Winner: Logitech G FITS is the most comfortable, thanks to its custom-molded fit.


5. Additional Features

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: IPX4 water resistance, app support for firmware updates and EQ customization, and easy dual-device switching with a 2-second touch.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: Features IPX4 water resistance, Smart Ambient technology, and beamforming microphones, but lacks app customization.
  • Logitech G FITS: Offers beamforming microphones and LIGHTFORM technology but lacks water resistance and has limited app functionality.

Winner: Middle Rabbit SW5 balances convenience and functionality with robust app support and dual-device compatibility.


6. Price

  • Middle Rabbit SW5: $59.99 (25% off, originally $79.99), offering excellent value for its robust features.
  • JBL Quantum TWS Air: $39.95 (60% off, originally $99.95), the most budget-friendly option but with some compromises in performance.
  • Logitech G FITS: $109.99 (27% off, originally $149.99), the priciest option despite some reported connectivity and battery issues.

Winner: JBL Quantum TWS Air is the most affordable, but Middle Rabbit SW5 provides the best balance of price and features.


Overall Recommendation: Middle Rabbit SW5

After comparing these earbuds across multiple factors, the Middle Rabbit SW5 emerges as the clear winner. With ultra-low latency, impressive battery life, HD audio quality, and an unbeatable price of $59.99, the SW5 is the ideal choice for gamers who want top-tier performance without breaking the bank.


Why Choose Middle Rabbit SW5?

  • Competitive Gaming: The 20ms latency ensures swift response times for competitive play.
  • Versatile Compatibility: Dual-device switching and support for PC, consoles, and mobile make it a versatile option.
  • Price-to-Performance: At just $59.99, it outperforms many pricier models like Logitech G FITS.
  • Long-Term Value: With app support for updates and EQ customization, the SW5 adapts to your needs.

For gamers seeking a balance of quality, functionality, and affordability, the Middle Rabbit SW5 is the perfect investment. Elevate your gaming experience today!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published